《不安》讲述了什么样的故事?
Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto there's no place like home is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage there's no sex like marital sex. Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the fairy godmother who speaks the last words in the movie.
1、《不安》是哪一年上映的?
《不安》是罗伯托·罗西里尼于1954年上映的一部经典剧情片。该片开创其它当时剧情片的先河,《不安》上映时全国票房稳前三,创下当年的纪录。当时英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特都成为了最佳主角,英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特以实力派演技和突出形象,奠定在其它影坛头号地位。英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特饰演的角色多年后仍为大众所模仿。罗伯托·罗西里尼之前曾被人们怀疑其能力,而《不安》却奠定罗伯托·罗西里尼剧情片别样风格。《不安》首映时曾获海内外剧情片和媒体的一致好评,被认为其优秀程度,是足以与同时期(指1980年代)好莱坞(好莱坞)优秀剧情片齐名。
2、被称为剧情片的开先河之作的《不安》,是罗伯托·罗西里尼最好的代表作吗?
从罗伯托·罗西里尼斩获剧情片最佳导演 我就觉得这部《不安》是他最好的剧情片。虽然罗伯托·罗西里尼后来还拍出来了评价特别好的剧情片,但是《不安》是他剧情片的代表作品。
3、《不安》究竟是何原因,让它在影史留名?
提起其它剧情片,人们就肯定会说出《不安》的名字。这部由罗伯托·罗西里尼导演,英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特主演的《不安》,之所以称其为奇迹,是因为这部作品在强敌环伺的局面下异军突起,以黑马之态杀出重围,取得了当时所有人都未曾预料到的成功。为何会这么说,我想,就连罗伯托·罗西里尼导演和英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特,都没想到这部剧情片会得到这样好的反响。罗伯托·罗西里尼先生曾说过,这是一群失意的人凑到了一起创作出来的一部作品。因为在《不安》开拍之前,英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特已经有4年无戏可拍,而英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特主演的剧情片,票房始终不理想,这样的几个人凑在了一起,也真是缘分!所以,正是这样的失意感和强烈的自尊心,他们在剧情片中投入的热情,是我们难以想象的,其实《不安》片中角色的心路历程与动人故事,何尝不是主创们现实境遇的银幕投射?正是带着这份不甘与倔强,他们倾尽才华与热忱,最终共同铸就了这部传世经典剧情片,也成就了他们自己!
4、如何评价《不安》?
《不安》口碑非常好深受广大观众喜爱,《不安》一经播放引来无数人赞叹,不仅英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特演的好而且该剧情片故事情节也非常连贯,小小影视(www.impulsivecode.com)观看起来特别流畅同时还能扣人心弦,虽然目前《不安》收视率一般但是该片目前受欢迎程度已经名列前茅。该剧情片主演英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特,她在该剧情片中的演技可圈可点,受到英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特演的好而且该剧情片迷的认可。
5、《不安》剧情片的主要内容
《不安》是一部剧情片剧情片,由导演:罗伯托·罗西里尼执导,主演:英格丽·褒曼,马蒂亚斯·维曼,雷娜特·曼哈特,
Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto there's no place like home is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage there's no sex like marital sex. Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the fairy godmother who speaks the last words in the movie.
6、《不安》是罗伯托·罗西里尼导演的一部超级经典的剧情其它片,该剧讲述了:Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the oth,想看更多的最新影视作品,请收藏我们的网站:www.impulsivecode.com
Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto there's no place like home is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage there's no sex like marital sex. Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the fairy godmother who speaks the last words in the movie.